Where are you supposed to start with Ahsoka?

This complex lineage might leave casual viewers, like your girlfriend, utterly baffled. We can thank the expectation that they’ve watched 208 episodes of television. A fact conveniently omitted from most of the marketing.

To its credit, Ahsoka isn’t entirely impenetrable for those who haven’t delved deep into the lore. A basic understanding of the titular character and her background helps, and the show’s main storyline isn’t overly convoluted. The real issue, however, lies in Ahsoka’s apparent lack of interest in forging emotional connections with its audience. Instead, it relies heavily on pre-existing connections from prior series. None of the characters in the show’s eight episodes are particularly engaging on their own, assuming that viewers already care about them based on their prior appearances.

Is Star Wars ever going to adapt to a wider audience?

In this day and age, a lot of companies are striving to reach the broadest audience possible. However, in the case of Star Wars, it seems to be going the other way. Also, the fans seem to like it and continually shun people getting into the franchise who haven’t watched previous works. If the future of the franchise continues to build on the foundation of a long-running cartoon, it’s uncertain whether it will remain accessible to the broader audience that initially embraced The Mandalorian’s first season.

Characters in Ahsoka

Ahsoka, as a show, falls remarkably short of delivering a fulfilling viewing experience. Actress Rosario Dawson takes on the role of the former Jedi. Although she certainly embodies the character visually, she lacks the screen presence or compelling depth needed to engage the audience. The series often presents her as a lifeless action figure, alluding to her past with mumblings about her former master, Anakin Skywalker (played by Hayden Christensen). However, merely showcasing a recognizable character’s face doesn’t suffice for quality television or storytelling. Dawson’s portrayal comes across as dull, devoid of distinct personality traits or visual flair. At times, she participates in entire action sequences with uncreative lightsaber swings while remaining motionless.

The supporting cast consists of characters borrowed from other Star Wars shows, leading to a reliance on prior media for any meaningful connection to them. Unfortunately, in Ahsoka’s eight episodes, these characters receive limited exploration and remain uninteresting. They seem like mere pawns in yet another generic Star Wars narrative that struggles to distinguish itself from its predecessors. While the series features familiar Star Wars symbols, it fails to introduce anything new to set these episodes apart from the multitude of others consumed over the years.

Cinematography and Television

Adding to the disappointment is the lackluster visual presentation of the series. Transitioning from animation to live-action is no easy feat. Ahsoka fails to establish a distinctive visual identity, resulting in a bland and uninspiring look. While the makeup and costumes are undoubtedly impressive, the cinematography fails to showcase them in a way that makes them genuinely captivating. Instead, many scenes appear as a mishmash of unexciting grey tones. Occasionally, the series introduces intriguing ideas, such as the inclusion of zombie stormtroopers, but the direction lacks the necessary personality and energy to transform these concepts into thrilling on-screen moments, reducing them to potentially enjoyable ideas that fall flat due to lackluster execution.

Why are Ahsoka reviews bad?

You might be reading this review and wondering why the criticisms seem so severe. After all, continuing storylines from previous installments is a common practice in serialized storytelling. That’s a valid point, to a certain extent. There’s nothing inherently wrong with Ahsoka wanting to build upon what Rebels left unfinished. However, it’s the way it approaches this task that’s frustrating. The series conceals its true intentions beneath the guise of being another Mandalorian spin-off, relying on the audience’s recognition of past characters and surprise cameos instead of taking a moment to reflect on what it has to offer and why it deserves to stand on its own. Ahsoka isn’t devoid of purpose, but it consistently feels misguided, leaving one to question why they didn’t simply create another season of Rebels instead.

The post Ahsoka – Disney Star Wars Show that’s actually good? appeared first on Bizznerd.

Of course, this is not all, and during the video above, conceptual or artistic images of the Obi-Wan Kenobi series can also be seen, without a doubt the most important of which is the confirmation of Darth Vader’s duel with Obi-Wan Kenobi, which can excite Star Wars fans. This video was supposed to be released tomorrow, but it has been revealed today.

Of course, McGregor can be seen in a robe in these pictures, and the clothes of this popular separation cannot be seen. Also in these pictures is no news of Hayden Christensen playing Darth Vader in the new Star Wars series, but you can see Empire Soldiers and Stormtroopers. Most of the people on the scene are not recognizable, but Indria Varma is one of the few actors who can be identified as wearing the clothes of the imperial forces.

Ewan McGregor as Obi-Wan Kenobi, Hayden Christensen as Darth Vader, Moses Ingram, Joel Egerton, Bonnie Piesse, Kumail Nanjiani, Indira Varma, Rupert Friend, O’shea Jackson Jr., Sung Kang, Simon Kessel, are among the actors who have appeared in the series Obi-Wan Kenobi and have played roles. The events of the Kenobi series are set to take place 10 years after the events of Revenge of the Sith.

The Obi-Wan Kenobi series, which is produced in 6 episodes, is scheduled to air in 2022 on the Disney Plus network. Joby Harold, better known as the author of Army of the Dead, wrote the screenplay for the Obi-Wan Kenobi series. Deborah Chao, director of the first two episodes of The Mandalorian, has directed Obi-Wan Kenobi.

The post Confirmation of Obi-Wan Kenobi’s duel with Darth Vader appeared first on Bizznerd.

However, this might be the only thing the two have in common – apart from the fact that their products are animated – of course. The reality is that the two have completely different ideas of what progression in their segment of the motion picture industry is.

A Quick Look At Where They Came From

Walt Disney burst onto the scene way back in 1928 with the very successful theatrical debut of the short, Steamboat Willie, animated film. It was also the debut of the now iconic Disney character, Mickey Mouse.

Studio Ghibli – on the other hand – is a significantly younger animation house, only coming to life years later in 1986, The first offering, Laputa: Castle In The Sky, immediately winning the favour of Japanese animation watchers.

Contrasting Approaches To Animation

Generally speaking, a large portion of all animated watchables that are available are built around a storyline of fantasy. Therefore, it is somewhat natural that this area would be one where the two production houses deviate from one another.

Walt Disney storylines tend to take the viewer’s imagination a great distance away from the stresses of the real world and into that of the protagonist that they are following. One could even view Disney’s style as being an escapist approach to storytelling.

Studio Ghibli takes a different approach. Although you still have the element of spirits and flying castles and the like. Ghibli’s time never stray too far away from social concepts that we are exposed to on a day to day basis – in many instances focusing on the negative ones- like greed and corruption. The Ghibli approach is a critique of some of humanities facets through animation.

The use of technologies like CGI is another point that represents a massive gulf of difference between the two.

Disney has always made a point of keeping up to date with the technical advances in their field. Combining this approach with the right talent was Disney’s way of striking gold.

Studio Ghibli is of a different view. Ghibli relies on traditional sketches and only uses technology to ever so subtly enhance their production process and its results. In this Studio Ghibli still benefits from new tech without it having “too much” of an effect on the overall look and feel of the film.

Conclusion

The reality is that the comparison between the two may not be a fair one. Disney has come a long way from its humble beginnings and is now an animation powerhouse that prides itself on how advanced its films are.

Ghibli’s focus is more about using meaningful storytelling to further the animation field. To Ghibli, new technologies are not much more than a tool that is used in much the same way as a subtle application of make-up. This makes it an apples versus oranges kind of comparison.

The post Studio Ghibli & Disney, How Different Are They? appeared first on Bizznerd.